[PATCH 4.4 63/76] PCI: Decouple IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE and PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>


From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 7a6d312b50e63f598f5b5914c4fd21878ac2b595 ]

Remove the assumption that IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE == PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE.
PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE is the ROM enable bit defined by the PCI spec, so if
we're reading or writing a BAR register value, that's what we should use.
IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE is a corresponding bit in struct resource flags.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/pci/probe.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -226,7 +226,8 @@ int __pci_read_base(struct pci_dev *dev,
 			mask64 = (u32)PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
 		}
 	} else {
-		res->flags |= (l & IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE);
+		if (l & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE)
+			res->flags |= IORESOURCE_ROM_ENABLE;
 		l64 = l & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK;
 		sz64 = sz & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK;
 		mask64 = (u32)PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK;