[PATCH 4.10 091/111] cpufreq: Restore policy min/max limits on CPU online

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit ff010472fb75670cb5c08671e820eeea3af59c87 upstream.

On CPU online the cpufreq core restores the previous governor (or
the previous "policy" setting for ->setpolicy drivers), but it does
not restore the min/max limits at the same time, which is confusing,
inconsistent and real pain for users who set the limits and then
suspend/resume the system (using full suspend), in which case the
limits are reset on all CPUs except for the boot one.

Fix this by making cpufreq_online() restore the limits when an inactive
policy is brought online.

The commit log and patch are inspired from Rafael's earlier work.

Reported-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1190,6 +1190,9 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int c
 		for_each_cpu(j, policy->related_cpus)
 			per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, j) = policy;
 		write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+	} else {
+		policy->min = policy->user_policy.min;
+		policy->max = policy->user_policy.max;
 	}
 
 	if (cpufreq_driver->get && !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {