Re: [PATCH] usb-musb: keep VBUS on when device is disconnected

[Tony Lindgren]

* Moreno Bartalucci <moreno.bartalucci@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [170327 23:12]:
> > Il giorno 27 mar 2017, alle ore 19:15, Bin Liu <b-liu@xxxxxx> ha scritto:
> > 
> > [â]
> > 
> > The MUSB otg state machine has been changed in many place since the last
> > time I looked at it, and I am not sure how exactly it works now.
> > 
> > If the $subject patch can correctly keep the VBUS on for host-only mode,
> > we can somehow use dr_modei value to distinguish the mode. We don't have
> > to create a new vbus-always-on-in-host-mode flag. VBUS has to be always
> > on in host-only mode anyway, until some error condition happens.
> > 
> 
> During my research, I used this patch to try to print the status of the usb port:
> 
> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c	2017-03-13 09:34:31.000000000 +0100
> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c	2017-03-13 09:36:02.000000000 +0100
> @@ -245,6 +245,8 @@ static void otg_timer(unsigned long _mus
>  	dev_dbg(musb->controller, "Poll devctl %02x (%s)\n", devctl,
>  				usb_otg_state_string(musb->xceiv->otg->state));
> 
> +	dev_emerg(musb->controller, "musb->xceiv->otg->state=%s, musb->port_mode=%d\n", usb_otg_state_string(musb->xceiv->otg->state),(int)musb->port_mode);
> +
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&musb->lock, flags);
>  	switch (musb->xceiv->otg->state) {
>  	case OTG_STATE_A_WAIT_BCON:
> 
> Unless I did something wrong, maybe itâs worth to notice that before the patch that apparently introduced this bug (2f3fd2c5bde1f94513c3dc311ae64494085ec371) I got nothing printed anywhere.
> With that patch applied, instead, I got the line printed in dmesg.
> I might be wrong but my assumption is that without that patch otg_timer was never called.
> If this is true, it would explain why writing 0 on DEVCTL didnât bother anything: it never happened.

OK yeah that makes sense.

Thanks,

Tony