Re: [BUG nohz]: wrong user and system time accounting

[Luiz Capitulino]

On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:24:11 -0400
Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 2017-03-28 at 16:14 -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> 
> > And I think I was right, it looks like the nohz code is programming
> > the tick period incorrectly when restarting the tick. The patch below
> > fixes things for me, but I still have some homework todo and more
> > testing before posting a patch for inclusion. Could you guys test it?  
> 
> I spoke too soon.  After half an hour of runtime,
> things have gotten aligned to give me about 50/50
> user time and system time with your test case,
> again.

Hmmm, maybe it's incomplete. I still think that nohz might screwing
something up when re-activating the tick.

> 
> This is on an 8 VCPU virtual machine, with
> nohz_full=2-7, and the test case running on one
> of the nohz_full CPUs.
> 
> > diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > index 7fe53be..9abe979 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > @@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart
> > tick_sched_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
> > ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂstruct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
> > ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂktime_t now = ktime_get();
> > Â
> > +ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂts->last_tick = now;
> > ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂtick_sched_do_timer(now);
> > Â
> > ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ/*  
>