[PATCH 2/4] x86/ldt: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic()
From: Andrey Ryabinin
Date: Thu Mar 30 2017 - 06:26:39 EST
vfree() can be used in any atomic context now, thus there is no point
in vfree_atomic().
This reverts commit 8d5341a6260a ("x86/ldt: use vfree_atomic()
to free ldt entries")
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
index d4a1583..f09df2f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static void free_ldt_struct(struct ldt_struct *ldt)
paravirt_free_ldt(ldt->entries, ldt->size);
if (ldt->size * LDT_ENTRY_SIZE > PAGE_SIZE)
- vfree_atomic(ldt->entries);
+ vfree(ldt->entries);
else
free_page((unsigned long)ldt->entries);
kfree(ldt);
--
2.10.2