Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: atomisp: simplify the if condition in atomisp_freq_scaling()

[DaeSeok Youn]

2017-03-30 19:52 GMT+09:00 Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 15:24 +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
>> The condition line in if-statement is needed to be shorthen to
>> improve readability.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>
> How about a define for ATOMISP_IS_CHT(isp) instead - as we will need
hmm.. I think there is another way to get a *device*(unsigned short or
__u32) to mask with "ATOMISP_PCI_DEVICE_SOC_MASK".
In the atomisp_freq_scaling() function, the "device" value is getting
started from "isp" structure.
(isp->pdev->device)

if the function has only "pci_dev" struction as a parameter and it
need to check the CHT. Then we cannot use the definition like
ATOMISP_IS_CHT(isp). it means we have another definition to check the
CHT.

Am I right?

> these tests in other places where there are ISP2400/ISP2401 ifdefs ?
I am not sure whether these tests are needed in other place or not.
(Actually, I didn't find good H/W reference for Atom ISP device - Can
you please share the link to refer document like H/W manual to
develop?) I have tried to clean up the code first. in the meantime, I
will have a look at the document if I have good reference manual.

Thanks.
Regards,
Daeseok.
>
> Alan
>