Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mce/AMD: Carve out SMCA bank configuration

[Borislav Petkov]

On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 01:34:42PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> I'd like to keep the functions separate since they're logically independent. I can
> define something like smca_configure() as a wrapper function that can contain
> current and future SMCA related functions. Is this okay?

Are you planning to call the one and not the other in some path?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.