On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Kuppuswamy SathyanarayananAgreed. This is added to list of issues that need to be fixed during the refactoring effort.
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To maintain the uniformity in accessing GCR registers, this patchThis one looks good.
modifies the S0ix counter read function to use GCR address base
instead of ipc address base.
--- 8< --- 8< ---
Overall, I do not like this spreading interface where we have more and
more functions which use some global variable without clear
understanding of device / initialization dependencies.
Will look into this and see whether we can use this design in our code..
Better approach would be something using opaque pointers and API which
takes it as an input.
I didn't investigate yet about something similar to UCLASS_SYSCON
(this is nice model of dependency used in U-Boot) in Linux kernel, it
would be cool to use it.
I have created patches to fix #1, I am in process of testing them. Once I am satisfied , I will send it for review.
So, the priority number #2 (number #1 is to fix interrupt handling for
Whiskey Cove) is to refactor this all mess.
:) Its our deal. Thanks.
Like we agreed it would be last series I'm going to apply without
refactoring done.
--- 8< --- 8< ---
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Shanth Murthy <shanth.murthy@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h | 2 ++
drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c | 10 +++-------
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Changes since v4:
* Rebased on top of latest changes.
Changes since v3:
* Rebased on top of latest changes.
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h
index 8402efe..fac89eb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
/* GCR reg offsets from gcr base*/
#define PMC_GCR_PMC_CFG_REG 0x08
+#define PMC_GCR_TELEM_DEEP_S0IX_REG 0x78
+#define PMC_GCR_TELEM_SHLW_S0IX_REG 0x80
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_PMC_IPC)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
index 3d0d6f17..b61f569 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
@@ -57,10 +57,6 @@
#define IPC_WRITE_BUFFER 0x80
#define IPC_READ_BUFFER 0x90
-/* PMC Global Control Registers */
-#define GCR_TELEM_DEEP_S0IX_OFFSET 0x1078
-#define GCR_TELEM_SHLW_S0IX_OFFSET 0x1080
-
/* Residency with clock rate at 19.2MHz to usecs */
#define S0IX_RESIDENCY_IN_USECS(d, s) \
({ \
@@ -203,7 +199,7 @@ static inline u32 ipc_data_readl(u32 offset)
static inline u64 gcr_data_readq(u32 offset)
{
- return readq(ipcdev.ipc_base + offset);
+ return readq(ipcdev.gcr_mem_base + offset);
}
static inline int is_gcr_valid(u32 offset)
@@ -906,8 +902,8 @@ int intel_pmc_s0ix_counter_read(u64 *data)
if (!ipcdev.has_gcr_regs)
return -EACCES;
- deep = gcr_data_readq(GCR_TELEM_DEEP_S0IX_OFFSET);
- shlw = gcr_data_readq(GCR_TELEM_SHLW_S0IX_OFFSET);
+ deep = gcr_data_readq(PMC_GCR_TELEM_DEEP_S0IX_REG);
+ shlw = gcr_data_readq(PMC_GCR_TELEM_SHLW_S0IX_REG);
*data = S0IX_RESIDENCY_IN_USECS(deep, shlw);
--
2.7.4