Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] drm/exynos: dsi: Fix the parse_dt function

From: Inki Dae
Date: Thu Apr 06 2017 - 00:34:16 EST




2017ë 04ì 05ì 00:38ì Krzysztof Kozlowski ì(ê) ì ê:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Merged.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I do not see the tag (with DT patches) merged by you which I provided
>> to you before. These are essential for bisectability. Without them,
>> kernel bisectability is broken. Did you merged the tag somewhere?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Inki Dae
>
> Inki,
>
> I still do not see the DTS tag [1] merged in your tree but you applied
> patches breaking the display. I looked at exynos-drm-next branch.
>
> We talked already about bisectability and with Hoegeun we provided
> proper solution. Hoegeun split the patchset and I sent you a stable
> tag to merge. Be aware not to apply the DTS patch because you would
> effectively duplicate it. Instead, deal like with any pull request -
> merge the tag as dependency *before* applying DRM DSI patch.

Krzysztof,

I think merging the DTS tag is not necessary because dt and drm patches will go to -next separately.
Anyway, confirmed your email just now. Seems better so did what you want.


Thanks,
Inki Dae

>
> I saw also a branch like this:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/daeinki/drm-exynos.git/log/?h=exynos-drm-next-tm2
> but this is something obviously wrong. I do not know what are your
> plans to do with it, but please drop it as it brings only confusion.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg567053.html
>
>>> 2017ë 03ì 22ì 10:36ì Hoegeun Kwon ì(ê) ì ê:
>>>> Hi inki,
>>>>
>>>> Could you check the this patch?
>>>> For reference, patch 1/5 and 2/5 have already been applied to Krzysztof tree.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Hoegeun
>>>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>