Re: [PATCH v2] can: m_can: enable transmission of FD frame on latest version

[Quentin Schulz]

Hi Oliver and Marc,

On 07/03/2017 02:03, Wenyou.Yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> HI Oliver, 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Oliver Hartkopp [mailto:socketcan@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: 2017å3æ7æ 5:26
>> To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wenyou Yang - A41535
>> <Wenyou.Yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Florian Fainelli
>> <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>; Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
>> Wenyou Yang - A41535 <Wenyou.Yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Nicolas Ferre
>> <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] can: m_can: enable transmission of FD frame on latest
>> version
>>
>> @Wenyou Yang: Can you please test the two patches posted here:
> 
> Tested on SAMA5D2 SoC, It works.
> 
>>
>> [PATCH 1/2] can: m_can: handle bitrate setup on IP core >= 3.1.x
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-can&m=148883529927720&w=2
>>
>> [PATCH 2/2] can: m_can: handle frame transmission on IP core >= 3.1.x
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-can&m=148883529927718&w=2
>>

Sorry, never received those mails so didn't know I had to do something.
I forgot to add my Signed-off-by when resending it so of course you can
add it to your next version:

Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

That gives me the opportunity to relaunch the discussion on it. What's
the status?

Quentin

>> Tnx & regards,
>> Oliver
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Wenyou Yang
> 

-- 
Quentin Schulz, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com