Re: [PATCH] scsi: mpt3sas: remove redundant wmb on arm/arm64
From: Sinan Kaya
Date: Fri Apr 07 2017 - 13:28:41 EST
On 4/7/2017 1:25 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>> The right thing was to either call __raw_writel/__raw_readl or
>> write_relaxed/read_relaxed for multi-arch compatibility.
> writeX_relaxed and thus your patch is definitely wrong. The reason is
> that we have two ordering domains: the CPU and the Bus. wmb forces
> ordering in the CPU domain but not the bus domain. writeX originally
> forced ordering in the bus domain but not the CPU domain, but since the
> raw primitives I think it now orders in both and writeX_relaxed orders
> in neither domain, so your patch would currently eliminate the bus
> ordering.
Yeah, that's why I recommended to remove the wmb() with a follow up
instead of using the relaxed with a follow up.
writel already guarantees ordering for both cpu and bus. we don't need
additional wmb()
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.