Re: [PATCH -mm 3/5] fault-inject: make fail-nth read/write interface symmetric

From: Dmitry Vyukov
Date: Fri Apr 07 2017 - 16:37:35 EST


On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The read interface for fail-nth looks a bit odd. Read from this file
> returns "NYYYY..." or "YYYYY..." (this makes me surprise when cat this
> file). Because there is no EOF condition. The first character indicates
> current->fail_nth is zero or not, and then current->fail_nth is reset
> to zero.
>
> Just returning task->fail_nth value is more natural to understand.
>
> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/fault-injection/fault-injection.txt | 13 +++++++------
> fs/proc/base.c | 14 ++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/fault-injection/fault-injection.txt b/Documentation/fault-injection/fault-injection.txt
> index a321905..370ddcb 100644
> --- a/Documentation/fault-injection/fault-injection.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/fault-injection/fault-injection.txt
> @@ -139,9 +139,9 @@ o proc entries
> - /proc/self/task/<current-tid>/fail-nth:
>
> Write to this file of integer N makes N-th call in the task fail.
> - Read from this file returns a single char 'Y' or 'N'
> - that says if the fault setup with a previous write to this file was
> - injected or not, and disables the fault if it wasn't yet injected.
> + Read from this file returns a integer value. A value of '0' indicates
> + that the fault setup with a previous write to this file was injected.
> + A positive integer N indicates that the fault wasn't yet injected.
> Note that this file enables all types of faults (slab, futex, etc).
> This setting takes precedence over all other generic debugfs settings
> like probability, interval, times, etc. But per-capability settings
> @@ -325,13 +325,14 @@ int main()
> write(fail_nth, buf, strlen(buf));
> res = socketpair(AF_LOCAL, SOCK_STREAM, 0, fds);
> err = errno;
> - read(fail_nth, buf, 1);
> + pread(fail_nth, buf, sizeof(buf), 0);
> if (res == 0) {
> close(fds[0]);
> close(fds[1]);
> }
> - printf("%d-th fault %c: res=%d/%d\n", i, buf[0], res, err);
> - if (buf[0] != 'Y')
> + printf("%d-th fault %c: res=%d/%d\n", i, atoi(buf) ? 'N' : 'Y',
> + res, err);
> + if (atoi(buf))
> break;
> }
> return 0;
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index 42c52e2..9d14215 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -1383,7 +1383,8 @@ static ssize_t proc_fail_nth_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> {
> struct task_struct *task;
> - int err;
> + char numbuf[PROC_NUMBUF];
> + ssize_t len;
>
> task = get_proc_task(file_inode(file));
> if (!task)
> @@ -1391,13 +1392,10 @@ static ssize_t proc_fail_nth_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> put_task_struct(task);
> if (task != current)
> return -EPERM;
> - if (count < 1)
> - return -EINVAL;
> - err = put_user((char)(current->fail_nth ? 'N' : 'Y'), buf);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> - current->fail_nth = 0;
> - return 1;
> + len = snprintf(numbuf, sizeof(numbuf), "%u\n", task->fail_nth);

If we allow setting this for non current task, then we need to prevent
data races as the task uses task->fail_nth concurrently. Reads then
should use READ_ONCE and writes in fault-inject.c should use
WRITE_ONCE.

> + len = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, numbuf, len);
> +
> + return len;
> }
>
> static const struct file_operations proc_fail_nth_operations = {
> --
> 2.7.4
>