Re: [PATCH 06/12] audit: Use timespec64 to represent audit timestamps

[Paul Moore]

On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I have no problem merging this patch into audit/next for v4.12, would
>> you prefer me to do that so at least this patch is merged?
>
> This would be fine.
> But, I think whoever takes the last 2 deletion patches should also take them.
> I'm not sure how that part works out.

FWIW, I just merged this into the audit/next branch so at least this
will go into v4.12.

>> It would probably make life a small bit easier for us in the audit
>> world too as it would reduce the potential merge conflict.  However,
>> that's a relatively small thing to worry about.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com