Re: [PATCH 01/32] mfd: exynos-lpass: Use common soc/exynos-regs-pmu.h header

[Kishon Vijay Abraham I]

Hi,

On Tuesday 11 April 2017 10:04 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tuesday 11 April 2017 07:44 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> The MFD-specific header will go away because it duplicates defines from
>>>> exynos-regs-pmu.h.
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>
>>> Okay, this is confusing.
>>>
>>> I'm guessing you're sending this to Greg for inclusion into -stable?
>>
>> No, it's not for stable. It's for 4.12.
> 
> Then I'm totally confused, since this patch has already been applied,
> which is obvious since I already signed it off?

With your immutable branch applied to phy tree, it's going to be part of my
pull request too.
> 
>>> Isn't there a way to specify this intention?
>>
>> The pull request (cover letter) specifies this intention.
> 
> Great!  But you forgot to send it to me, doh!
> 
> Why are you sending patches with a pull-request?

Greg KH sometimes would like to take a look at the patches that are part of the
pull request. I've been practicing it for a long time.
> 
>>> Also, patch 1 and 3 appear to be identical.
>>>
>>> Not even sure how that's possible.
> 
> Still have no idea how you managed to do this!

I think first it got applied when I applied patches from local-next to next and
then I did a merge of your immutable branch.

Thanks
Kishon