Re: [PATCH V2] clk: hi6220: Add the hi655x's pmic clock

[Stephen Boyd]

On 04/08, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>  
>  Example:
>  	pmic: pmic@f8000000 {
> @@ -24,4 +29,5 @@ Example:
>  		interrupt-controller;
>  		#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>  		pmic-gpios = <&gpio1 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +		clock-cells = <0>;

Should be #clock-cells instead.

>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/Makefile b/drivers/clk/Makefile
> index 92c12b8..c19983a 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/Makefile
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_PALMAS)		+= clk-palmas.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_PWM)		+= clk-pwm.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_QORIQ)			+= clk-qoriq.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_RK808)		+= clk-rk808.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_HI655X)		+= clk-hi655x.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_S2MPS11)	+= clk-s2mps11.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_SCPI)           += clk-scpi.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_SI5351)		+= clk-si5351.o
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-hi655x.c b/drivers/clk/clk-hi655x.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b2bea32
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-hi655x.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
> +
> +static int hi655x_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *parent = pdev->dev.parent;
> +	struct hi655x_pmic *hi655x = dev_get_drvdata(parent);
> +	struct clk_init_data *hi655x_clk_init;

This can just go onto the stack? We don't need it around after
probe.

> +	struct hi655x_clk *hi655x_clk;
> +	const char *clk_name = "hi655x-clk";
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	hi655x_clk = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hi655x_clk), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!hi655x_clk)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	hi655x_clk_init = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hi655x_clk_init),
> +				       GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!hi655x_clk_init)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	of_property_read_string_index(parent->of_node, "clock-output-names",
> +				      0, &clk_name);
> +
> +	hi655x_clk_init->name	= clk_name;
> +	hi655x_clk_init->ops	= &hi655x_clk_ops;
> +
> +	hi655x_clk->clk_hw.init	= hi655x_clk_init;
> +	hi655x_clk->hi655x	= hi655x;
> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, hi655x_clk);
> +
> +	ret = devm_clk_hw_register(&pdev->dev, &hi655x_clk->clk_hw);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = of_clk_add_hw_provider(parent->of_node, of_clk_hw_simple_get,
> +				     &hi655x_clk->clk_hw);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = clk_hw_register_clkdev(&hi655x_clk->clk_hw, clk_name, NULL);

Missed this last time. Do you use this clkdev lookup? The name is
usually supposed to be based on what the device is expecting,
instead of clk_name, and we would want some device name for the
third argument here.

> +	if (ret)
> +		of_clk_del_provider(parent->of_node);
> +
> +	return ret;

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project