Hi Aneesh,
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V
<aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
powerpc arch_mmap_rnd() currently uses hard-coded values - (23-PAGE_SHIFT) for
32-bit and (30-PAGE_SHIFT) for 64-bit, to generate the random offset
for the mmap base address for a ASLR ELF.
This patch makes sure that powerpc mmap arch_mmap_rnd() implementation
is similar to other ARCHs (like x86, arm64) and uses mmap_rnd_bits
and helpers to generate the mmap address randomization.
The maximum and minimum randomization range values represent
a compromise between increased ASLR effectiveness and avoiding
address-space fragmentation.
Using the Kconfig option and suitable /proc tunable, platform
developers may choose where to place this compromise.
Also this patch keeps the default values as new minimums.
Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
* Changes since v2:
v2 can be seen here (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9551509/)
- Changed a few minimum and maximum randomization ranges as per Michael's suggestion.
- Corrected Kees's email address in the Reviewed-by line.
- Added further comments in kconfig to explain how the address ranges were worked out.
* Changes since v1:
v1 can be seen here (https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2017-February/153594.html)
- No functional change in this patch.
- Dropped PATCH 2/2 from v1 as recommended by Kees Cook.
arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/mm/mmap.c | 7 ++++---
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
index 97a8bc8..84aae67 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
@@ -22,6 +22,48 @@ config MMU
bool
default y
+# min bits determined by the following formula:
+# VA_BITS - PAGE_SHIFT - CONSTANT
+# where,
+# VA_BITS = 46 bits for 64BIT and 4GB - 1 Page = 31 bits for 32BIT
Where did we derive that 46 bits from ? is that based on TASK_SIZE ?
Yes. It was derived from TASK_SIZE :
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h#L105