Re: [v2,2/2] hwmon: (lm87) Add OF device ID table

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Thu Apr 13 2017 - 09:10:20 EST


On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 09:21:39PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The driver doesn't have a struct of_device_id table but supported devices
> are registered via Device Trees. This is working on the assumption that a
> I2C device registered via OF will always match a legacy I2C device ID and
> that the MODALIAS reported will always be of the form i2c:<device>.
>
> But this could change in the future so the correct approach is to have an
> OF device ID table if the devices are registered via OF.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied.

Thanks,
Guenter

> ---
> Hello,
>
> I should had included this patch in series [0] but it seems that I didn't.
>
> [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/24/360
>
> Best regards,
> Javier
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Use the correct driver in subject line.
> - Keep OF device ID table sorted in the same order than I2C device ID table.
>
> drivers/hwmon/lm87.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm87.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm87.c
> index c0766e7392d3..b48d30760388 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm87.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm87.c
> @@ -985,10 +985,18 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id lm87_id[] = {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, lm87_id);
>
> +static const struct of_device_id lm87_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "ti,lm87" },
> + { .compatible = "adi,adm1024" },
> + { },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, lm87_of_match);
> +
> static struct i2c_driver lm87_driver = {
> .class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON,
> .driver = {
> .name = "lm87",
> + .of_match_table = lm87_of_match,
> },
> .probe = lm87_probe,
> .id_table = lm87_id,