Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: update scale invariance of PELT

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 04:59:15PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 13 April 2017 at 15:32, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 01:28:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> >> I still wonder about the whole !running vs !weight thing.,
> >
> > Ah, since we use this for both util _and_ load, we need !running &&
> > !weight, and it so happens that !weight implies !running. Is that it?
> 
> exactly
> sorry, I should have started with that

Damn, that just bring me around to wondering why running is the right
condition to create lost-time.

Because for runnable we want everything that has weight.