Re: [Patch v2 1/2] lustre: Parantheses added for Macro argument to avoid precedence issues
From: greg@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat Apr 15 2017 - 07:49:45 EST
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 11:25:00AM +0000, Rishiraj Manwatkar wrote:
> From: RishirajAM <manwatkar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Parantheses are added for Macro argument, to avoid precedence issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rishiraj Manwatkar <manwatkar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
What changed from v1? Always put that below the --- line.
And your From: line doesn't match your signed-off-by name, that's not
ok.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c
> index ee7d677..0997254 100755
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c
> @@ -52,9 +52,9 @@
> */
>
> #define cl_io_for_each(slice, io) \
> - list_for_each_entry((slice), &io->ci_layers, cis_linkage)
> + list_for_each_entry((slice), &(io)->ci_layers, cis_linkage)
What 'precidence' issue is this fixing? How could that ever be
incorrect?
Really, this macro just needs to go away and be used "as is" anyway...
thanks,
greg k-h