Re: [PATCH 3/8] x86/boot/64: Add support of additional page table level during early boot

From: Kirill A. Shutemov
Date: Tue Apr 18 2017 - 05:01:22 EST


On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:32:25PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 07:09:07AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > I'll look closer (building proccess it's rather complicated), but my
> > > > understanding is that VDSO is stand-alone binary and doesn't really links
> > > > with the rest of the kernel, rather included as blob, no?
> > > >
> > > > Andy, may be you have an idea?
> > >
> > > There isn't any way I know of to directly link them together. The ELF
> > > format wasn't designed for that. You would need to merge blobs and then use
> > > manual jump vectors, like the 16bit startup code does. It would be likely
> > > complicated and ugly.
> >
> > Ingo, can we proceed without coverting this assembly to C?
> >
> > I'm committed to convert it to C later if we'll find reasonable solution
> > to the issue.
>
> So one way to do it would be to build it standalone as a .o, then add it not to
> the regular kernel objects link target (as you found out it's not possible to link
> 32-bit and 64-bit objects), but to link it in a manual fashion, as part of
> vmlinux.bin.all-y in arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile.
>
> But there would be other complications with this approach, such as we'd have to
> add a size field and there might be symbol linking problems ...
>
> Another, pretty hacky way would be to generate a .S from the .c, then post-process
> the .S and essentially generate today's 32-bit .S from it.
>
> Probably not worth the trouble.

So, do I need to do anything else to get part 4 applied?

--
Kirill A. Shutemov