Re: Build failure in -next due to 'hexagon: switch to RAW_COPY_USER'
From: Al Viro
Date: Sun Apr 23 2017 - 23:31:39 EST
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 05:35:45PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> hexagon:defconfig fails to build in -next with the following build error.
>
>
> In file included from include/linux/uaccess.h:13:0,
> from include/linux/poll.h:11,
> from include/linux/ring_buffer.h:7,
> from include/linux/trace_events.h:5,
> from include/trace/syscall.h:6,
> from include/linux/syscalls.h:82,
> from init/main.c:20:
> arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h: In function 'hexagon_strncpy_from_user':
> arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h:100:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'copy_from_user' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> In file included from include/linux/poll.h:11:0,
> from include/linux/ring_buffer.h:7,
> from include/linux/trace_events.h:5,
> from include/trace/syscall.h:6,
> from include/linux/syscalls.h:82,
> from init/main.c:20:
> include/linux/uaccess.h: At top level:
> include/linux/uaccess.h:145:1: error: conflicting types for 'copy_from_user'
> arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h:100:3: note: previous implicit declaration of 'copy_from_user' was here
Hmm... FWIW, this
static inline long hexagon_strncpy_from_user(char *dst, const char __user *src,
long n)
{
long res = __strnlen_user(src, n);
if (unlikely(!res))
return -EFAULT;
if (res > n) {
copy_from_user(dst, src, n);
return n;
} else {
copy_from_user(dst, src, res);
return res-1;
}
}
is bloody wrong. Think what happens if in getname_flags() we have
__strnlen_user(filename, EMBEDDED_NAME_MAX) return 2. We call
copy_from_user(kname, filename, 2) and return 1. For caller it means
"one-character string, NUL-terminated", but there's no warranty that
the second byte copied had been NUL. And the destination was *NOT*
zero-filled, so there's nothing to guarantee us any zero bytes until
the end of allocated area.
If strncpy_from_user(dst, src, n) returns a number less than n, the result
must be NUL-terminated. Looking through other architectures, nios2 appears
to be vulnerable to the same problem. I hadn't finished looking
(xtensa, h8300 and score left to check), but the rest appears to be OK...