Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: add KVM_CREATE_VM2 system ioctl

[Radim KrÄmÃÅ]

2017-04-18 16:30+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 18/04/2017 16:16, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> This patch allows userspace to tell how many VCPUs it is going to use,
>>> which can save memory when allocating the kvm->vcpus array.  This will
>>> be done with a new KVM_CREATE_VM2 IOCTL.
>>>
>>> An alternative would be to redo kvm->vcpus as a list or protect the
>>> array with RCU.  RCU is slower and a list is not even practical as
>>> kvm->vcpus are being used for index-based accesses.
>>>
>>> We could have an IOCTL that is called in between KVM_CREATE_VM and first
>>> KVM_CREATE_VCPU and sets the size of the vcpus array, but we'd be making
>>> one useless allocation.  Knowing the desired number of VCPUs from the
>>> beginning is seems best for now.
>>>
>>> This patch also prepares generic code for architectures that will set
>>> KVM_CONFIGURABLE_MAX_VCPUS to a non-zero value.
>> Why is KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID or KVM_MAX_VCPUS not enough?
> 
> Ok, for KVM_MAX_VCPUS I should have read the cover letter more carefully. :)

KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID makes sense as the upper bound, I just didn't want to
mingle the concepts, because the kvm->vcpus array is not indexed by
VCPU_ID ...
In hindsight, it would be best to change that and get rid of the search.
I'll see how that looks in v2.