Re: [PATCH 4/8] random: remove unused branch in hot code path

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Ted,

(replying to an old thread)

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 11:40:23PM +0100, Stephan MÃller wrote:
>> The variable ip is defined to be a __u64 which is always 8 bytes on any
>> architecture. Thus, the check for sizeof(ip) > 4 will always be true.
>>
>> As the check happens in a hot code path, remove the branch.
>
> The fact that it's a hot code path means the compiler will optimize it
> out, so the fact that it's on the hot code path is irrelevant.  The
> main issue is that on platforms with a 32-bit IP's, ip >> 32 will
> always be zero.  It might be that we can just do this via
>
> #if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
>   ...
> #else
>   ...
> #endif
>
> I'm not sure that works for all platforms, though.  More research is
> needed...

Is the intention for the test "sizeof(ip) > 4" to distinguish between
32-bit and 64-bit platforms?
As ip is __u64, while regs is a pointer, shouldn't the test be
"sizeof(regs) > 4"?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds