Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: Silence vmap() allocation failures based on caller gfp_flags

[Florian Fainelli]

On 04/27/2017 10:56 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 27-04-17 10:38:58, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> If the caller has set __GFP_NOWARN don't print the following message:
>> vmap allocation for size 15736832 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase
>> size.
>>
>> This can happen with the ARM/Linux or ARM64/Linux module loader built
>> with CONFIG_ARM{,64}_MODULE_PLTS=y which does a first attempt at loading
>> a large module from module space, then falls back to vmalloc space.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> just a nit
> 
>> ---
>>  mm/vmalloc.c | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
>> index 0b057628a7ba..d8a851634674 100644
>> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
>> @@ -521,9 +521,13 @@ static struct vmap_area *alloc_vmap_area(unsigned long size,
>>  		}
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOWARN)
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>>  	if (printk_ratelimit())
> 
> 	if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOWARN) && printk_ratelimit())
>>  		pr_warn("vmap allocation for size %lu failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size\n",
>>  			size);
> 
> would be shorter and you wouldn't need the goto and a label.

Do you want me to resubmit with that change included?
-- 
Florian