[PATCH] checkpatch: Improve the embedded function name test for patch contexts

[Joe Perches]

The current test works only for a single patch context as it is
done in the foreach ($rawlines) loop that precedes the loop where
the actual $context_function variable is used.
'
Move the set of $context_function into the foreach (@lines) loop
where it is useful for each patch context.

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 17 ++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 5270f7948493..c8573aece06c 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -2195,8 +2195,7 @@ sub process {
 			}
 			#next;
 		}
-		if ($rawline=~/^\@\@ -\d+(?:,\d+)? \+(\d+)(,(\d+))? \@\@(.*)/) {
-			my $context = $4;
+		if ($rawline =~ /^\@\@ -\d+(?:,\d+)? \+(\d+)(,(\d+))? \@\@/) {
 			$realline=$1-1;
 			if (defined $2) {
 				$realcnt=$3+1;
@@ -2205,12 +2204,6 @@ sub process {
 			}
 			$in_comment = 0;
 
-			if ($context =~ /\b(\w+)\s*\(/) {
-				$context_function = $1;
-			} else {
-				undef $context_function;
-			}
-
 			# Guestimate if this is a continuing comment.  Run
 			# the context looking for a comment "edge".  If this
 			# edge is a close comment then we must be in a comment
@@ -2281,7 +2274,8 @@ sub process {
 
 #extract the line range in the file after the patch is applied
 		if (!$in_commit_log &&
-		    $line =~ /^\@\@ -\d+(?:,\d+)? \+(\d+)(,(\d+))? \@\@/) {
+		    $line =~ /^\@\@ -\d+(?:,\d+)? \+(\d+)(,(\d+))? \@\@(.*)/) {
+			my $context = $4;
 			$is_patch = 1;
 			$first_line = $linenr + 1;
 			$realline=$1-1;
@@ -2297,6 +2291,11 @@ sub process {
 			%suppress_whiletrailers = ();
 			%suppress_export = ();
 			$suppress_statement = 0;
+			if ($context =~ /\b(\w+)\s*\(/) {
+				$context_function = $1;
+			} else {
+				undef $context_function;
+			}
 			next;
 
 # track the line number as we move through the hunk, note that
-- 
2.10.0.rc2.1.g053435c