Re: new ...at() flag: AT_NO_JUMPS

From: Al Viro
Date: Sun Apr 30 2017 - 12:11:38 EST

Next message: Joe Perches: "Re: [PATCH] printk: Add best-effort printk() buffering."
Previous message: SF Markus Elfring: "[PATCH] fuse: Use kmalloc_array() in three functions"
In reply to: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: new ...at() flag: AT_NO_JUMPS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 09:38:22PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> It sounds more like AT_NO_ESCAPE ... or AT_BELOW, or something.

I considered AT_ROACH_MOTEL at one point... Another interesting
question is whether EXDEV would've been better than ELOOP.
Opinions?

Next message: Joe Perches: "Re: [PATCH] printk: Add best-effort printk() buffering."
Previous message: SF Markus Elfring: "[PATCH] fuse: Use kmalloc_array() in three functions"
In reply to: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: new ...at() flag: AT_NO_JUMPS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]