On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 10:42:04AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
This patch allows the use of IRQ to notify the change of GPIO status
on MPC8xx CPM IO ports. This then allows to associate IRQs to GPIOs
in the Device Tree.
Ex:
CPM1_PIO_C: gpio-controller@960 {
#gpio-cells = <2>;
compatible = "fsl,cpm1-pario-bank-c";
reg = <0x960 0x10>;
interrupts = <1 2 6 9 10 11 14 15 23 24 26 31>;
interrupts-mask = <0x0fff>;
interrupt-parent = <&CPM_PIC>;
gpio-controller;
};
The property 'interrupts-mask' defines which of the 16 GPIOs have
the associated interrupts defined in the 'interrupts' property.
Binding? Should also be named something like "fsl,cpm1-gpio-irq-mask",
static int cpm1_gpio16_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
{
struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc = to_of_mm_gpio_chip(gc);
@@ -618,6 +633,7 @@ int cpm1_gpiochip_add16(struct device_node *np)
struct cpm1_gpio16_chip *cpm1_gc;
struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc;
struct gpio_chip *gc;
+ u16 mask;
cpm1_gc = kzalloc(sizeof(*cpm1_gc), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cpm1_gc)
@@ -625,6 +641,14 @@ int cpm1_gpiochip_add16(struct device_node *np)
spin_lock_init(&cpm1_gc->lock);
+ if (!of_property_read_u16(np, "interrupts-mask", &mask)) {
+ int i, j;
+
+ for (i = 0, j = 0; i < 16; i++)
+ if (mask & (1 << (15 - i)))
+ cpm1_gc->irq[i] = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, j++);
+ }
Do we really need to use MSB-first bit numbering here?