Re: [PATCH 01/10] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: introduce fext_*() helper functions

[MichaÅ KÄpieÅ]

> > @@ -272,9 +292,9 @@ static int bl_get_brightness(struct backlight_device *b)
> >  static int bl_update_status(struct backlight_device *b)
> >  {
> >  	if (b->props.power == FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN)
> > -		call_fext_func(FUNC_BACKLIGHT, 0x1, 0x4, 0x3);
> > +		fext_backlight(0x1, 0x4, 0x3);
> >  	else
> > -		call_fext_func(FUNC_BACKLIGHT, 0x1, 0x4, 0x0);
> > +		fext_backlight(0x1, 0x4, 0x0);
> >  
> >  	return set_lcd_level(b->props.brightness);
> >  }
> > @@ -610,22 +630,22 @@ static int logolamp_set(struct led_classdev *cdev,
> >  	if (brightness < LED_FULL)
> >  		always = FUNC_LED_OFF;
> >  
> > -	ret = call_fext_func(FUNC_LEDS, 0x1, LOGOLAMP_POWERON, poweron);
> > +	ret = fext_leds(0x1, LOGOLAMP_POWERON, poweron);
> >  	if (ret < 0)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > -	return call_fext_func(FUNC_LEDS, 0x1, LOGOLAMP_ALWAYS, always);
> > +	return fext_leds(0x1, LOGOLAMP_ALWAYS, always);
> >  }
> 
> I've only just noticed this.  For the led calls we have symbolic identifiers
> defined for the "features" parameter, but in the backlight case we are still
> using arbitrary numeric constants.  Although not necessary for this patch
> set, we should consider adding feature identifiers for the other fext_*() calls.
> Similarly for the "op" parameter where it makes sense to do so.

Good point, I will keep that in mind for the next patch series.

-- 
Best regards,
MichaÅ KÄpieÅ