Re: [usb-host] question about pointer dereference before null check
From: Alan Stern
Date: Tue May 02 2017 - 10:19:27 EST
On Mon, 1 May 2017, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> While taking a look into Coverity ID 100828 I ran into the following
> piece of code at drivers/usb/host/ehci-sched.c:1096:
>
> u32 addr;
> int think_time;
> int hs_transfers;
>
> addr = dev->ttport << 24;
> if (!ehci_is_TDI(ehci)
> || (dev->tt->hub !=
> ehci_to_hcd(ehci)->self.root_hub))
> addr |= dev->tt->hub->devnum << 16;
> addr |= epnum << 8;
> addr |= dev->devnum;
> stream->ps.usecs = HS_USECS_ISO(maxp);
> think_time = dev->tt ? dev->tt->think_time : 0;
>
> The issue here is that dev->tt is being dereferenced before null check.
>
> I was thinking on placing think_time = dev->tt ? dev->tt->think_time :
> 0; just before the _if_ statement. But this doesn't address the
> problem of dev->tt actually being NULL.
>
> While looking into the callers of the function containing this piece
> of code (iso_stream_init()) my impression is that dev->tt is not NULL
> at the time this function is called and, a very simple patch like the
> following can be applied in order to avoid the Coverity issue:
>
> -think_time = dev->tt ? dev->tt->think_time : 0;
> +think_time = dev->tt->think_time;
>
> But I can't tell for sure, so in case dev->tt is NULL, a good strategy
> to properly update the _addr_ variable would be needed.
>
> What do you think?
>
> I would really appreciate any comment on this,
> Thank you!
You are right; udev->tt cannot ever be NULL when this section of code
runs. The test should be removed.
Alan Stern