Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect
From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Thu May 04 2017 - 03:06:35 EST
On 04/05/2017 05:36, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> As there is no conflict between these two patchsets except dirty
> ring pages takes benefit from write-protect-all, i think they
> can be developed and iterated independently, right?
I can certainly start reviewing this one.
> Or you prefer to merge dirty ring pages first then review the
> new version of this patchset later?