Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

[Lee Jones]

On Thu, 04 May 2017, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> thanks for the series.
> 
> > Most patches can be applied independently, with the exception of patches
> > 2 to 4 that should be applied in the same tree to keep bisect-ability. I
> > suggest these to go through the MFD subsystem tree.
> 
> From my POV, patches 2-5 should be applied to the same tree. Since all
> I2C related patches have my tag, I assume they will be picked up by MFD.
> Lee, let me know if you prefer differently.

I can pick them up, no problem.  Can the ARM patches be taking
independently?  I'm guessing they can since they are separate from one
another.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog