Re: [PATCH v3] iio: adc: Add support for TI ADC108S102 and ADC128S102
From: Jan Kiszka
Date: Fri May 05 2017 - 06:24:00 EST
On 2017-05-05 11:40, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 08:31:32AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> +static int adc108s102_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>> +{
>> + struct adc108s102_state *st;
>> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*st));
>> + if (!indio_dev)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>> +
>> + if (ACPI_COMPANION(&spi->dev)) {
>> + st->reg = NULL;
>> + ret = device_property_read_u32(&spi->dev, "va-millivolt",
>> + &st->va_millivolt);
>
> Please try to avoid things like this for now. You can just hard code the
> voltage now and we can think how to solve this in ACPI if there will be
> an actual user needing anything else than the voltage you are using on
> your board.
OK, so I will set a static 5V in case of ACPI. Fine as well.
>
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(&spi->dev,
>> + "Missing va-millivolt device property\n");
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + st->reg = devm_regulator_get(&spi->dev, "vref");
>> + if (IS_ERR(st->reg))
>> + return PTR_ERR(st->reg);
>
> This should be an optional regulator and in case of ACPI you just don't
> have it.
It's mandatory for this DT case, so I will not change that.
Thanks,
Jan
>
>> +
>> + ret = regulator_enable(st->reg);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "Cannot enable vref regulator\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux