Re: [PATCH v2] sd: Ignore sync cache failures when not supported

[Thierry Escande]

On 05/05/2017 11:02, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Normally we'd just pass the scsi_sense_hdr structure in from the
> caler if we care about sense data.  Is this something you considered?
Not really as only the sense_key field is needed for only one call to 
sd_sync_cache() (out of two).

> Otherwise this looks fine to me.