Re: [PATCH v2] sd: Ignore sync cache failures when not supported

From: Thierry Escande
Date: Fri May 05 2017 - 07:46:40 EST

On 05/05/2017 11:02, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Normally we'd just pass the scsi_sense_hdr structure in from the
caler if we care about sense data. Is this something you considered?
Not really as only the sense_key field is needed for only one call to sd_sync_cache() (out of two).

Otherwise this looks fine to me.