[PATCH 3.18 60/68] staging: unisys: correctly handle return value from queue_delayed_work()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Benjamin Romer <benjamin.romer@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit f84bd6267d623b49f196d54ba9edc41ff1c4d5e3 upstream.

Properly handle the return value from queue_delayed_work() - it's a
bool, not an int, so using a less than comparison isn't appropriate.

This mistake was found by David Binderman <dcb314@xxxxxxxxxxx>.

[arnd: the fix is from 4.4 but needed some minor fixup to adapt
 to context changes]

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Romer <benjamin.romer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/staging/unisys/visorutil/periodic_work.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorutil/periodic_work.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorutil/periodic_work.c
@@ -98,8 +98,8 @@ BOOL visor_periodic_work_nextperiod(stru
 		pw->want_to_stop = FALSE;
 		rc = TRUE;  /* yes, TRUE; see visor_periodic_work_stop() */
 		goto unlock;
-	} else if (queue_delayed_work(pw->workqueue, &pw->work,
-				      pw->jiffy_interval) < 0) {
+	} else if (!queue_delayed_work(pw->workqueue, &pw->work,
+				       pw->jiffy_interval)) {
 		ERRDEV(pw->devnam, "queue_delayed_work failed!");
 		pw->is_scheduled = FALSE;
 		rc = FALSE;
@@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ BOOL visor_periodic_work_start(struct pe
 		goto unlock;
 	}
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&pw->work, &periodic_work_func);
-	if (queue_delayed_work(pw->workqueue, &pw->work,
-			       pw->jiffy_interval) < 0) {
+	if (!queue_delayed_work(pw->workqueue, &pw->work,
+				pw->jiffy_interval)) {
 		ERRDEV(pw->devnam, "%s queue_delayed_work failed!", __func__);
 		rc = FALSE;
 		goto unlock;