Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] fs: ubifs: set s_uuid in super block

[Oleksij Rempel]

On 05/02/2017 09:37 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Amir,
>
> Am 02.05.2017 um 09:19 schrieb Amir Goldstein:
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Am 24.04.2017 um 17:47 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
> > > > > So, if some flag should be implemented, who should do it? :)
> > > >
> > > > I'll not do it for you. ;)
> > >
> > > Please also see http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=149327990608749&w=2
> >
> > Richard,
> >
> > Considering the facts that:
> > 1. I proposed the said flag and Al didn't think it was needed [1]
> > 2. ext4 already sets s_uuid without any flag for a long time now
> > 3. A similar patch was queued for v4.12 to set s_uuid for xfs without any flag
> >
> > I think it would be right to take Oleksij's patch as is.
> >
> > FYI, my current work on 'constant inode numbers for overlayfs' requires that
> > underlying filesystem had set a non-zero s_uuid. Not sure if that matters for
> > ubifs+overlayfs users.
>
> If VFS maintainers are fine with that, I'll take it.
> From UBIFS' POV it does not matter much. :-)

Ping to VFS maintainers?