On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 13:57 +0200, Tim Sander wrote:My logic here was that if the gpio is optional return null we return 0.
This patch contains much input from Phil Reid and has been tested
on Intel/Altera Cyclone V SOC Hardware with Altera GPIO's for the
SCL and SDA GPIO's. I am still a little unsure about the recover
in the timeout case (i2c-designware-core.c:770) as i could not
test this codepath.
Since it's not an RFC anymore let me do some comments on the below.
@@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ static void i2c_dw_release_lock(struct dw_i2c_dev
*dev)
dev->release_lock(dev);
}
+
/**
* i2c_dw_init() - initialize the designware i2c master hardware
* @dev: device private data
This doesn't belong to the change.
@@ -463,7 +464,12 @@ static int i2c_dw_wait_bus_not_busy(struct
dw_i2c_dev *dev)
while (dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_STATUS) & DW_IC_STATUS_ACTIVITY) {
if (timeout <= 0) {
dev_warn(dev->dev, "timeout waiting for bus
ready\n");
- return -ETIMEDOUT;
+ i2c_recover_bus(&dev->adapter);
+
+ if (dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_STATUS) &
DW_IC_STATUS_ACTIVITY)
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+ else
Redundant.
+ return 0;
}
Actually I would rather refactor first above function:
1) to be do {} while();
2) to have invariant condition out of the loop.
timeout--;
usleep_range(1000, 1100);
@@ -719,9 +725,10 @@ static int i2c_dw_handle_tx_abort(struct
dw_i2c_dev *dev)
for_each_set_bit(i, &abort_source, ARRAY_SIZE(abort_sources))
dev_err(dev->dev, "%s: %s\n", __func__,
abort_sources[i]);
- if (abort_source & DW_IC_TX_ARB_LOST)
+ if (abort_source & DW_IC_TX_ARB_LOST) {
+ i2c_recover_bus(&dev->adapter);
return -EAGAIN;
- else if (abort_source & DW_IC_TX_ABRT_GCALL_READ)
+ } else if (abort_source & DW_IC_TX_ABRT_GCALL_READ)
return -EINVAL; /* wrong msgs[] data */
else
Both else:s are redundant.
if (abort_source & DW_IC_TX_ARB_LOST) {
i2c_recover_bus(&dev->adapter);
return -EAGAIN;
}
if (abort_source & DW_IC_TX_ABRT_GCALL_READ)
...
Though I may agree on leaving them here for sake of keeping less lines
of code.
return -EIO;
+#include <linux/gpio.h>
I think it should be
#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
#include <linux/reset.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
No, please don't.
In recent code we try to avoid OF/ACPI/platform specific bits if there
is a common resource provider (and API) for that. GPIO is the case.
+void i2c_dw_unprepare_recovery(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
+{
+}
+
+
Remove extra line.
+static int i2c_dw_get_scl(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
+{
+ struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(&adap->dev);
+ struct dw_i2c_dev *dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct dw_i2c_dev *dev = i2c_get_adapdata(adap); ?
Ditto for all occurrences in the code.
+
+ return gpiod_get_value_cansleep(dev->gpio_scl);
+}
+static int i2c_dw_init_recovery_info(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev,
+ struct i2c_adapter *adap)
+{
+ struct i2c_bus_recovery_info *rinfo = &dev->rinfo;
+
+ dev->gpio_scl = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev->dev,
+ "scl",
+ GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev->gpio_scl))
This is wrong. You should not use this macro in most cases. And
especially it breaks the logic behind _optional().
From my first attempt, didn't remove it from the example I sent.
+ return PTR_ERR(dev->gpio_scl);
+
+ dev->gpio_sda = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev->dev, "sda",
GPIOD_IN);
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev->gpio_sda))
Ditto.
+ return PTR_ERR(dev->gpio_sda);
+ rinfo->scl_gpio = desc_to_gpio(dev->gpio_scl);
+ rinfo->sda_gpio = desc_to_gpio(dev->gpio_sda);
Why?!
+};
@@ -285,6 +368,7 @@ static int dw_i2c_plat_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev)
adap->class = I2C_CLASS_DEPRECATED;
ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&adap->dev, ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev));
adap->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
+ snprintf(adap->name, sizeof(adap->name), "Designware i2c
adapter");
It looks like a separate change.
+ r = i2c_dw_init_recovery_info(dev, adap);
+ if (r == -EPROBE_DEFER)
Remove extra space.
+ goto exit_probe;
+
r = i2c_dw_probe(dev);
if (r)
goto exit_probe;
- return r;
+ return 0;
Doesn't belong to the change.
Don't change arbitrary typos or do small "improvements" in the change
which is not about them.