RE: [PATCH] qed: fix uninitialized data in aRFS intrastructure

[Mintz, Yuval]

> > For the most part - I'm almost all in favor of this change.
> > But just to make it clear - the actual fix could have been a one-liner, right?
> > The rest are style changes.

> Correct. Having the correct length in the memset is a sufficient fix for the warning,
> but it felt wrong to send it since the root of the problem seems to be the
> complexity of the code that was hiding it.

...

> Generally speaking, feel free to treat any of my compile-time warning fix
> patches as simple bug reports and apply a different fix that seems more
> appropriate. I mainly send it in patch form since that seems to be the
> quickest way to address any issues.

Sure. 

Once net-next is re-opened I intend to push our next FW version which
is also going to change some of the aRFS related configurations.

So I think we should stick to the single-liner fix for now,
and I'll revise the style [if still needed; I'll have to check] on that submission.