Re: Is there an recommended way to refer to bitkeepr commits?

[Rob Landley]

On 05/11/2017 01:59 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Eric W. Biederman
>> <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thomas Gleixner appears to have a tree with all of those same commits
>>> except with the BKrev tags stripped out.
>>
>> That's the best import - so use that tree by Thomas, and just use the
>> git revision numbers in it (and say "tglx's linux-history tree" or
>> something).
> 
> I've been using this one by Rob Landley which seems good:
> 
> https://landley.net/kdocs/fullhist/
>
> It's grafted into the modern history so you can search seamlessly
> between the two which is pretty nice. I don't see any Bitkeeper tags
> though.

I went through and found/tagged the major old releases, did I forget to
upload a new tarball after that?

v0.0.1 cff5a6fb66765e90470f4d9ca2398da0ca3c75d5
v1.0.0 a068026b4a060e822892a64d5107fb58c45743ef
v1.2.0 8610c92442d125f165dc84e4a96f5cbc9b240484
v2.0.0 a374953c636bd91ea40b2d1e31af5405b90e8bf8
v2.2.0 bf330b5e3c471d0b67737c4822b0174ef4f89bed
v2.4.0 13a80dffb74939e292b6e90e5d79dd26d577489f
v2.6.0 4e9b4bc7a660962ae5f04f939469263b91cf95c2

Rob