å 2017-05-15 17:24ïMaxime Ripard åéï
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 12:30:43AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
+ de2_clocks: clock@1000000 {
display_clocks would be better there, we don't have to dissociate de1
with de2
How about de_clocks ? (See A80 DTSI)
+ compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-v3s-de2-clk";
+ reg = <0x01000000 0x100000>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_DE>,
+ <&ccu CLK_BUS_DE>;
+ clock-names = "mod",
+ "bus";
+ resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_DE>;
+ #clock-cells = <1>;
+ #reset-cells = <1>;
+ };
+
+ de2_mixer0: mixer@1100000 {
and mixer0 here is enough too.
Is there several of them? Why not just use mixer if there's only one?
Nope, here it's tagged 0 only for consistency with other SoCs.
+ compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-v3s-de2-mixer";
+ reg = <0x01100000 0x100000>;
+ clocks = <&de2_clocks CLK_MIXER0>,
+ <&de2_clocks CLK_BUS_MIXER0>;
+ clock-names = "mod",
+ "bus";
+ resets = <&de2_clocks RST_MIXER0>;
+ assigned-clocks = <&de2_clocks CLK_MIXER0>;
+ assigned-clock-rates = <150000000>;
+
+ ports {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ mixer0_out: port@1 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ reg = <1>;
+
+ mixer0_out_tcon0: endpoint@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
+ remote-endpoint = <&tcon0_in_mixer0>;
+ };
+ };
+ };
+ };
+
+ tcon0: lcd-controller@1c0c000 {
+ compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-v3s-tcon";
+ reg = <0x01c0c000 0x1000>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 86 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_TCON0>,
+ <&ccu CLK_TCON0>;
+ clock-names = "ahb",
+ "tcon-ch0";
+ clock-output-names = "tcon-pixel-clock";
+ resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_TCON0>;
+ reset-names = "lcd";
+ status = "disabled";
+
+ ports {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ tcon0_in: port@0 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ reg = <0>;
+
+ tcon0_in_mixer0: endpoint@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
+ remote-endpoint = <&mixer0_out_tcon0>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ tcon0_out: port@1 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ reg = <1>;
+ };
+ };
+ };
+
+
You have an extra new line here.
Maxime