Re: [RESEND PATCH] llist: Provide a safe version for llist_for_each

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu May 18 2017 - 04:36:15 EST

Next message: Leno Hou: "[PATCH v3 2/2] lib/btree.c: add testcase for in-memory b+ tree"
Previous message: Leno Hou: "[PATCH v3 1/2] lib/btree.c: optimise the code by previously getpos function"
In reply to: Byungchul Park: "Re: [RESEND PATCH] llist: Provide a safe version for llist_for_each"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

OK, picked up all 4:

patches/byungchul_park-llist-provide_a_safe_version_for_llist_for_each.patch
patches/byungchul_park-sched-don_t_reinvent_the_wheel_but_use_existing_llist_api.patch
patches/byungchul_park-sched_rt-remove_unnecessary_condition_in_push_rt_task.patch
patches/byungchul_park-sched_deadline-remove_unnecessary_condition_in_push_dl_task.patch

Next message: Leno Hou: "[PATCH v3 2/2] lib/btree.c: add testcase for in-memory b+ tree"
Previous message: Leno Hou: "[PATCH v3 1/2] lib/btree.c: optimise the code by previously getpos function"
In reply to: Byungchul Park: "Re: [RESEND PATCH] llist: Provide a safe version for llist_for_each"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]