[PATCH 4.11 088/114] f2fs: fix fs corruption due to zero inode page
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Thu May 18 2017 - 07:57:00 EST
4.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 9bb02c3627f46e50246bf7ab957b56ffbef623cb upstream.
This patch fixes the following scenario.
- f2fs_create/f2fs_mkdir - write_checkpoint
- f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync - block_operations
- f2fs_lock_all
- f2fs_sync_inode_meta
- f2fs_unlock_all
- sync_inode_metadata
- f2fs_lock_op
- f2fs_write_inode
- update_inode_page
- get_node_page
return -ENOENT
- new_inode_page
- fill_node_footer
- f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync
- ...
- f2fs_unlock_op
- f2fs_inode_synced
- f2fs_lock_all
- do_checkpoint
In this checkpoint, we can get an inode page which contains zeros having valid
node footer only.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/f2fs/inode.c | 2 +-
fs/f2fs/namei.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
@@ -316,7 +316,6 @@ retry:
} else if (err != -ENOENT) {
f2fs_stop_checkpoint(sbi, false);
}
- f2fs_inode_synced(inode);
return 0;
}
ret = update_inode(inode, node_page);
@@ -448,6 +447,7 @@ void handle_failed_inode(struct inode *i
* in a panic when flushing dirty inodes in gdirty_list.
*/
update_inode_page(inode);
+ f2fs_inode_synced(inode);
/* don't make bad inode, since it becomes a regular file. */
unlock_new_inode(inode);
--- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
@@ -148,8 +148,6 @@ static int f2fs_create(struct inode *dir
inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &f2fs_dblock_aops;
ino = inode->i_ino;
- f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
-
f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
err = f2fs_add_link(dentry, inode);
if (err)
@@ -163,6 +161,8 @@ static int f2fs_create(struct inode *dir
if (IS_DIRSYNC(dir))
f2fs_sync_fs(sbi->sb, 1);
+
+ f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
return 0;
out:
handle_failed_inode(inode);
@@ -423,8 +423,6 @@ static int f2fs_symlink(struct inode *di
inode_nohighmem(inode);
inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &f2fs_dblock_aops;
- f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
-
f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
err = f2fs_add_link(dentry, inode);
if (err)
@@ -487,6 +485,8 @@ err_out:
}
kfree(sd);
+
+ f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
return err;
out:
handle_failed_inode(inode);
@@ -508,8 +508,6 @@ static int f2fs_mkdir(struct inode *dir,
inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &f2fs_dblock_aops;
mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping, GFP_F2FS_HIGH_ZERO);
- f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
-
set_inode_flag(inode, FI_INC_LINK);
f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
err = f2fs_add_link(dentry, inode);
@@ -524,6 +522,8 @@ static int f2fs_mkdir(struct inode *dir,
if (IS_DIRSYNC(dir))
f2fs_sync_fs(sbi->sb, 1);
+
+ f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
return 0;
out_fail:
@@ -554,8 +554,6 @@ static int f2fs_mknod(struct inode *dir,
init_special_inode(inode, inode->i_mode, rdev);
inode->i_op = &f2fs_special_inode_operations;
- f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
-
f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
err = f2fs_add_link(dentry, inode);
if (err)
@@ -569,6 +567,8 @@ static int f2fs_mknod(struct inode *dir,
if (IS_DIRSYNC(dir))
f2fs_sync_fs(sbi->sb, 1);
+
+ f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
return 0;
out:
handle_failed_inode(inode);
@@ -595,8 +595,6 @@ static int __f2fs_tmpfile(struct inode *
inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &f2fs_dblock_aops;
}
- f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
-
f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
err = acquire_orphan_inode(sbi);
if (err)
@@ -622,6 +620,8 @@ static int __f2fs_tmpfile(struct inode *
/* link_count was changed by d_tmpfile as well. */
f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
unlock_new_inode(inode);
+
+ f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
return 0;
release_out: