Re: [PATCH 2/2] zram: do not count duplicated pages as compressed
From: Minchan Kim
Date: Sun May 21 2017 - 03:15:59 EST
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 12:04:27AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 05:32:12PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Is block device(esp, zram which is compressed ram block device) okay to
> > return garbage when ongoing overwrite IO fails?
> >
> > O_DIRECT write 4 block "aaa.." -> success
> > read 4 block "aaa.." -> success
> > O_DIRECT write 4 block "bbb.." -> fail
> > read 4 block "000..' -> it is okay?
> >
> > Hope to get an answer form experts. :)
>
> It's "okay" as it's what existing real block devices do (at least on a
> sector boundary). It's not "nice" though, so if you can avoid it,
> please do.
That was my understanding so I wanted to avoid it for just simple
code refactoring. Your comment helps to confirm the thhought.
Thanks, Christoph!