Re: [PATCH 0/7] generate full callchain cursor entries for inlined frames
From: Namhyung Kim
Date: Mon May 22 2017 - 08:09:38 EST
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 09:34:04PM +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> This series of patches completely reworks the way inline frames are handled.
> Instead of querying for the inline nodes on-demand in the individual tools,
> we now create proper callchain nodes for inlined frames. The advantages this
> approach brings are numerous:
>
> - less duplicated code in the individual browser
> - aggregated cost for inlined frames for the --children top-down list
> - various bug fixes that arose from querying for a srcline/symbol based on
> the IP of a sample, which will always point to the last inlined frame
> instead of the corresponding non-inlined frame
> - overall much better support for visualizing cost for heavily-inlined C++
> code, which simply was confusing and unreliably before
> - srcline honors the global setting as to whether full paths or basenames
> should be shown
>
> For comparison, below lists the output before and after for `perf script`
> and `perf report`. The example file I used to generate the perf data is:
>
> ~~~~~
> $ cat inlining.cpp
> #include <complex>
> #include <cmath>
> #include <random>
> #include <iostream>
>
> using namespace std;
>
> int main()
> {
> uniform_real_distribution<double> uniform(-1E5, 1E5);
> default_random_engine engine;
> double s = 0;
> for (int i = 0; i < 10000000; ++i) {
> s += norm(complex<double>(uniform(engine), uniform(engine)));
> }
> cout << s << '\n';
> return 0;
> }
> $ g++ -O2 -g -o inlining inlining.cpp
> $ perf record --call-graph dwarf ./inlining
> ~~~~~
>
> Now, the (broken) status-quo looks like this. Look for "NOTE:" to see some
> of my comments that outline the various issues I'm trying to solve by this
> patch series.
>
> ~~~~~
> $ perf script --inline
> ...
> inlining 11083 97459.356656: 33680 cycles:
> 214f7 __hypot_finite (/usr/lib/libm-2.25.so)
> ace3 hypot (/usr/lib/libm-2.25.so)
> a4a main (/home/milian/projects/src/perf-tests/inlining)
> std::__complex_abs
> std::abs<double>
> std::_Norm_helper<true>::_S_do_it<double>
> std::norm<double>
> main
> 20510 __libc_start_main (/usr/lib/libc-2.25.so)
> bd9 _start (/home/milian/projects/src/perf-tests/inlining)
> # NOTE: the above inlined stack is confusing: the a4a is an address into main,
> # which is the non-inlined symbol. the entry with the address should be
> # at the end of the stack, where it's actually duplicated once more but
> # there it's missing the address
Omitting address was to distinguish inlined entries from others. I
didn't think it's a problem by itself (missed inter-operability below),
but duplicated entries should be removed.
> ...
> $ perf report -s sym -g srcline -i perf.inlining.data --inline --stdio
> ...
> --38.86%--_start
> __libc_start_main
> |
> |--15.68%--main random.tcc:3326
> | /home/milian/projects/src/perf-tests/inlining.cpp:14 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:1809 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:1818 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:185 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.tcc:3326 (inline)
> |
> |--10.36%--main random.h:143
> | /home/milian/projects/src/perf-tests/inlining.cpp:14 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:1809 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:1818 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:185 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.tcc:3332 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:332 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:151 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:143 (inline)
> |
> |--5.66%--main random.tcc:3332
> | /home/milian/projects/src/perf-tests/inlining.cpp:14 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:1809 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:1818 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:185 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.tcc:3332 (inline)
> ...
> # NOTE: the grouping is totally off because the first and last frame of the
> inline nodes is completely bogus, since the IP is used to find the sym/srcline
> which is different from the actual inlined sym/srcline.
> also, the code currently displays either the inlined function name or
> the corresponding filename (but in full length, instead of just the basename).
Yes, inlined nodes should have correct IP for later use.
>
> $ perf report -s sym -g srcline -i perf.inlining.data --inline --stdio --no-children
> ...
> 38.86% [.] main
> |
> |--15.68%--main random.tcc:3326
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.tcc:3326 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:185 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:1818 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:1809 (inline)
> | /home/milian/projects/src/perf-tests/inlining.cpp:14 (inline)
> | __libc_start_main
> | _start
> ...
> # NOTE: the srcline for main is wrong, it should be inlining.cpp:14,
> i.e. what is displayed in the line below (see also perf script issue above)
OK.
> ~~~~~
>
> Afterwards, all of the above issues are resolved:
>
> ~~~~~
> $ perf script --inline
> ...
> inlining 11083 97459.356656: 33680 cycles:
> 214f7 __hypot_finite (/usr/lib/libm-2.25.so)
> ace3 hypot (/usr/lib/libm-2.25.so)
> a4a std::__complex_abs (inlined)
> a4a std::abs<double> (inlined)
> a4a std::_Norm_helper<true>::_S_do_it<double> (inlined)
> a4a std::norm<double> (inlined)
> a4a main (/home/milian/projects/src/perf-tests/inlining)
> 20510 __libc_start_main (/usr/lib/libc-2.25.so)
> bd9 _start (/home/milian/projects/src/perf-tests/inlining)
> ...
> # NOTE: only one main entry, at the correct position.
> we do display the (repeated) instruction pointer as that ensures
> interoperability with e.g. the stackcollapse-perf.pl script
Looks good.
>
> $ perf report -s sym -g srcline -i perf.inlining.data --inline --stdio
> ...
> 100.00% 38.86% [.] main
> |
> |--61.14%--main inlining.cpp:14
> | std::norm<double> complex:664 (inlined)
> | std::_Norm_helper<true>::_S_do_it<double> complex:654 (inlined)
> | std::abs<double> complex:597 (inlined)
> | std::__complex_abs complex:589 (inlined)
> | |
> | |--60.29%--hypot
> | | |
> | | --56.03%--__hypot_finite
> | |
> | --0.85%--cabs
> |
> --38.86%--_start
> __libc_start_main
> |
> |--38.19%--main inlining.cpp:14
> | |
> | |--35.59%--std::uniform_real_distribution<double>::operator()<std::linear_congruential_engine<unsigned long, 16807ul, 0ul, 2147483647ul> > random.h:1809 (inlined)
> | | std::uniform_real_distribution<double>::operator()<std::linear_congruential_engine<unsigned long, 16807ul, 0ul, 2147483647ul> > random.h:1818 (inlined)
> | | |
> | | --34.37%--std::__detail::_Adaptor<std::linear_congruential_engine<unsigned long, 16807ul, 0ul, 2147483647ul>, double>::operator() random.h:185 (inlined)
> | | |
> | | |--17.91%--std::generate_canonical<double, 53ul, std::linear_congruential_engine<unsigned long, 16807ul, 0ul, 2147483647ul> > random.tcc:3332 (inlined)
> | | | |
> | | | --12.24%--std::linear_congruential_engine<unsigned long, 16807ul, 0ul, 2147483647ul>::operator() random.h:332 (inlined)
> | | | std::__detail::__mod<unsigned long, 2147483647ul, 16807ul, 0ul> random.h:151 (inlined)
> | | | |
> | | | |--10.36%--std::__detail::_Mod<unsigned long, 2147483647ul, 16807ul, 0ul, true, true>::__calc random.h:143 (inlined)
> | | | |
> | | | --1.88%--std::__detail::_Mod<unsigned long, 2147483647ul, 16807ul, 0ul, true, true>::__calc random.h:141 (inlined)
> | | |
> | | |--15.68%--std::generate_canonical<double, 53ul, std::linear_congruential_engine<unsigned long, 16807ul, 0ul, 2147483647ul> > random.tcc:3326 (inlined)
> | | |
> | | --0.79%--std::generate_canonical<double, 53ul, std::linear_congruential_engine<unsigned long, 16807ul, 0ul, 2147483647ul> > random.tcc:3335 (inlined)
> | |
> | --1.99%--std::norm<double> complex:664 (inlined)
> | std::_Norm_helper<true>::_S_do_it<double> complex:654 (inlined)
> | std::abs<double> complex:597 (inlined)
> | std::__complex_abs complex:589 (inlined)
> |
> --0.67%--main inlining.cpp:13
> ...
>
> # NOTE: still somewhat confusing due to the _start and __libc_start_main frames
> that actually are *above* the main frame. But at least the stuff below
> properly splits up and shows that mutiple functions got inlined into
> inlining.cpp:14, not just one as before.
Right. Current callchain mode has the problem. It shows a mix of
callchains of a sample and children of the sample. I proposed a patch
[1] to handle it but I failed to find time to update it as Jiri
suggested.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/14/49
>
> $ perf report -s sym -g srcline -i perf.inlining.data --inline --stdio --no-children
> ...
> 38.86% [.] main
> |
> |--15.68%--std::generate_canonical<double, 53ul, std::linear_congruential_engine<unsigned long, 16807ul, 0ul, 2147483647ul> > random.tcc:3326 (inlined)
> | std::__detail::_Adaptor<std::linear_congruential_engine<unsigned long, 16807ul, 0ul, 2147483647ul>, double>::operator() random.h:185 (inlined)
> | std::uniform_real_distribution<double>::operator()<std::linear_congruential_engine<unsigned long, 16807ul, 0ul, 2147483647ul> > random.h:1818 (inlined)
> | std::uniform_real_distribution<double>::operator()<std::linear_congruential_engine<unsigned long, 16807ul, 0ul, 2147483647ul> > random.h:1809 (inlined)
> | main inlining.cpp:14
> | __libc_start_main
> | _start
> ...
> # NOTE: the first and last entry of the inline stack have the correct symbol and srcline now
> both function and srcline is shown, as well as the (inlined) suffix
> only the basename of the srcline is shown
Nice work!
But I found some problems in both of your patch and current code
during testing (mostly for the children mode). I'll send a fix soon.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> ~~~~~
>
> Milian Wolff (7):
> perf report: remove code to handle inline frames from browsers
> perf util: take elf_name as const string in dso__demangle_sym
> perf report: create real callchain entries for inlined frames
> perf report: use srcline from inlined frames
> perf report: fall-back to function name comparison for -g srcline
> perf report: mark inlined frames in output by " (inlined)" suffix
> perf script: mark inlined frames and do not print DSO for them
>
> tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c | 183 +++------------------------------------
> tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c | 80 +----------------
> tools/perf/util/callchain.c | 52 +++++------
> tools/perf/util/callchain.h | 5 +-
> tools/perf/util/dso.c | 2 +
> tools/perf/util/dso.h | 1 +
> tools/perf/util/evsel_fprintf.c | 37 +-------
> tools/perf/util/hist.c | 5 --
> tools/perf/util/machine.c | 54 +++++++++++-
> tools/perf/util/sort.h | 1 -
> tools/perf/util/srcline.c | 183 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> tools/perf/util/srcline.h | 19 +++-
> tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/util/symbol-minimal.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/util/symbol.h | 3 +-
> 15 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 365 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.13.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html