Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Use dmi_system_id table for retrieving frequency

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2017-05-22 19:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 2017-05-22 19:20, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On 2017-05-22 19:12, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>>> And since there is no difference to the frequency the name is enough.
>>>> So, I wouldn't go with this series as is. See above.
>>>
>>> Nope: Just like for the stmmac, we need to include the asset tags to
>>> avoid matching variations of the devices which may carry the same board
>>> name. While I will try to avoid that this happens, we are better safe
>>> than sorry here.
>>
>> Do we have an issue right now?
>> Yes / No
>
> Andy, we are trying to design a robust upstream driver here, no ad-hoc
> BSP that will not survive the hardware anyway.

You didn't answer my question...

I do not see a good point to solve the issue that might happen in the future.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko