Re: [PATCH 7/7] DWARF: add the config option

[Ingo Molnar]

* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 05/22/17 04:12, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> \>>
> >> This construct might be useful for other arches, which is why I called
> >> it "FP" instead of "BP".  But then I ruined that with the last 3 :-)
> > 
> > Please call it BP - 'FP' can easily be read as floating-point, making it all 
> > super-confusing. We should use canonical x86 register names and ordering - even
> > if not all registers are used straight away.
> > 
> 
> Seriously, I suspect that at the end of the day we will have reinvented
> DWARF.

Absolutely - the main difference is:

 - the debug-info implementation is _internal_ to the kernel so it can be fixed
   instead of "oh, wait 2 years for the toolchain to fix this particular bug, work
   it around in the kernel meanwhile" kind of crazy flow and dependencies. I.e. 
   the debug-info generation and parsing code is both part of the kernel Git tree 
   and can be iterated (and fixed) at once with.

 - the debug-info is auto-generated for assembly as well, leaving assembly code 
   maintainable.

 - the debug-info has a sane data structure designed for robustness and 
   compactness

So even if it's a subset of the existing complexity of dwarf et al we are still 
literally infinitely better off with this model.

Thanks,

	Ingo