Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are missing it

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Lee,

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 May 2017, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> thanks for the series.
>>>
>>> > Most patches can be applied independently, with the exception of patches
>>> > 2 to 4 that should be applied in the same tree to keep bisect-ability. I
>>> > suggest these to go through the MFD subsystem tree.
>>>
>>> From my POV, patches 2-5 should be applied to the same tree. Since all
>
> Yes, I didn't mention 5 because is just a documentation change. But it
> would be better if is merged together with 2-4 indeed.
>
>>> I2C related patches have my tag, I assume they will be picked up by MFD.
>>> Lee, let me know if you prefer differently.
>>
>> I can pick them up, no problem.  Can the ARM patches be taking
>> independently?  I'm guessing they can since they are separate from one
>> another.
>>
>
> That's corect. The only platform changes that can't be picked
> independently from MFD are the ones in patch 2, but tha's why I added
> in the same patch. The OMAP folks (Tony and Aaro) already acked so you
> can pick it.
>

Is there anything else I need to do for you to pick this series?

Best regards,
Javier