Re: [linux-sunxi] [RFC PATCH 10/11] ARM: sun8i: h3: add display engine pipeline for TVE
From: Icenowy Zheng
Date: Wed May 24 2017 - 01:37:17 EST
ä 2017å5æ24æ GMT+08:00 äå1:34:58, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> åå:
>On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>> ä 2017å5æ24æ GMT+08:00 äå1:24:29, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> åå:
>>>On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@xxxxxxx>
>>>wrote:
>>>> As we have already the support for the TV encoder on Allwinner H3,
>>>add
>>>> the display engine pipeline device tree nodes to its DTSI file.
>>>>
>>>> The H5 pipeline has some differences and will be enabled later.
>>>>
>>>> The currently-unused mixer0 and tcon0 are also needed, for the
>>>> completement of the pipeline.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@xxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi | 189
>>>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 189 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
>>>b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
>>>> index b36f9f423c39..20172ef92415 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
>>>> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@
>>>> */
>>>>
>>>> #include "sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi"
>>>> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/sun8i-de2.h>
>>>> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/sun8i-de2.h>
>>>>
>>>> / {
>>>> cpus {
>>>> @@ -72,6 +74,193 @@
>>>> };
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> + de: display-engine {
>>>> + compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-display-engine";
>>>> + allwinner,pipelines = <&mixer0>,
>>>> + <&mixer1>;
>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + soc {
>>>> + display_clocks: clock@1000000 {
>>>> + compatible =
>"allwinner,sun8i-a83t-de2-clk";
>>>> + reg = <0x01000000 0x100000>;
>>>> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_DE>,
>>>> + <&ccu CLK_DE>;
>>>> + clock-names = "bus",
>>>> + "mod";
>>>> + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_DE>;
>>>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #reset-cells = <1>;
>>>> + assigned-clocks = <&ccu CLK_DE>;
>>>> + assigned-clock-parents = <&ccu CLK_PLL_DE>;
>>>> + assigned-clock-rates = <432000000>;
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + mixer0: mixer@1100000 {
>>>> + compatible =
>"allwinner,sun8i-h3-de2-mixer0";
>>>> + reg = <0x01100000 0x100000>;
>>>> + clocks = <&display_clocks CLK_BUS_MIXER0>,
>>>> + <&display_clocks CLK_MIXER0>;
>>>> + clock-names = "bus",
>>>> + "mod";
>>>> + resets = <&display_clocks RST_MIXER0>;
>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>> +
>>>> + ports {
>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> +
>>>> + mixer0_out: port@1 {
>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> + reg = <1>;
>>>> +
>>>> + mixer0_out_tcon0:
>endpoint@0
>>>{
>>>> + reg = <0>;
>>>> + remote-endpoint =
>>><&tcon0_in_mixer0>;
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + mixer0_out_tcon1:
>endpoint@1
>>>{
>>>> + reg = <1>;
>>>> + remote-endpoint =
>>><&tcon1_in_mixer0>;
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + mixer1: mixer@1200000 {
>>>> + compatible =
>"allwinner,sun8i-h3-de2-mixer1";
>>>> + reg = <0x01200000 0x100000>;
>>>> + clocks = <&display_clocks CLK_BUS_MIXER1>,
>>>> + <&display_clocks CLK_MIXER1>;
>>>> + clock-names = "bus",
>>>> + "mod";
>>>> + resets = <&display_clocks RST_WB>;
>>>> +
>>>> + ports {
>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> +
>>>> + mixer1_out: port@1 {
>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> + reg = <1>;
>>>> +
>>>> + mixer1_out_tcon1:
>endpoint@0
>>>{
>>>> + reg = <0>;
>>>
>>>I would prefer if you could stick to the numbering scheme we're using
>>>for
>>>Display Engine 1.0, as in endpoint 0 links to component 0 of whatever
>>>type.
>>
>> If we keep this we will need a ugly id property in mixer node,
>> otherwise we cannot know which TCON to be bind.
>
>Why? You can simply change the logic in your driver from:
>
> if (remote_endpoint.id) { continue; }
>
>to:
>
> if (local_endpoint.id != remote_endpoint.id) { continue; }
Thanks, I forgot that there's two endpoint ids...
So silly I am.
>
>I don't see the need for any ID property in the mixer node in this
>case.
>The ID is already encoded into the endpoint IDs.
>
>ChenYu
>
>>>
>>>We're probably going to stick to that for the R40's incredibly
>>>complicated
>>>pipeline. I don't want to have any outliers unless absolutely
>>>necessary.
>>>
>>>ChenYu
>>>
>>>> + remote-endpoint =
>>><&tcon1_in_mixer1>;
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + mixer1_out_tcon0:
>endpoint@1
>>>{
>>>> + reg = <1>;
>>>> + remote-endpoint =
>>><&tcon0_in_mixer1>;
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + tcon0: lcd-controller@1c0c000 {
>>>> + compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-tcon0";
>>>> + reg = <0x01c0c000 0x1000>;
>>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 86
>>>IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_TCON0>,
>>>> + <&ccu CLK_TCON0>;
>>>> + clock-names = "ahb",
>>>> + "tcon-ch1";
>>>> + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_TCON0>;
>>>> + reset-names = "lcd";
>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>> +
>>>> + ports {
>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> +
>>>> + tcon0_in: port@0 {
>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> + reg = <0>;
>>>> +
>>>> + tcon0_in_mixer0: endpoint@0
>{
>>>> + reg = <0>;
>>>> + remote-endpoint =
>>><&mixer0_out_tcon0>;
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + tcon0_in_mixer1: endpoint@1
>{
>>>> + reg = <1>;
>>>> + remote-endpoint =
>>><&mixer1_out_tcon0>;
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + tcon1: lcd-controller@1c0d000 {
>>>> + compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-tcon1";
>>>> + reg = <0x01c0d000 0x1000>;
>>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 87
>>>IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_TCON1>;
>>>> + clock-names = "ahb";
>>>> + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_TCON1>;
>>>> + reset-names = "lcd";
>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>> +
>>>> + ports {
>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> +
>>>> + tcon1_in: port@0 {
>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> + reg = <0>;
>>>> +
>>>> + tcon1_in_mixer1: endpoint@0
>{
>>>> + reg = <0>;
>>>> + remote-endpoint =
>>><&mixer1_out_tcon1>;
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + tcon1_in_mixer0: endpoint@1
>{
>>>> + reg = <1>;
>>>> + remote-endpoint =
>>><&mixer0_out_tcon1>;
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + tcon1_out: port@1 {
>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> + reg = <1>;
>>>> +
>>>> + tcon1_out_tve0: endpoint@1
>{
>>>> + reg = <1>;
>>>> + remote-endpoint =
>>><&tve0_in_tcon1>;
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + tve0: tv-encoder@1e00000 {
>>>> + compatible =
>"allwinner,sun8i-h3-tv-encoder";
>>>> + reg = <0x01e00000 0x1000>;
>>>> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_TVE>, <&ccu
>CLK_TVE>;
>>>> + clock-names = "bus", "mod";
>>>> + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_TVE>;
>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>> +
>>>> + assigned-clocks = <&ccu CLK_TVE>;
>>>> + assigned-clock-parents = <&ccu CLK_PLL_DE>;
>>>> + assigned-clock-rates = <216000000>;
>>>> +
>>>> + port {
>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> +
>>>> + tve0_in_tcon1: endpoint@0 {
>>>> + reg = <0>;
>>>> + remote-endpoint =
>>><&tcon1_out_tve0>;
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> timer {
>>>> compatible = "arm,armv7-timer";
>>>> interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) |
>>>IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
>>>> --
>>>> 2.12.2
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.