Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Implement delayed_work_busy()

[Tejun Heo]

Hello, Alex.

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:58:19PM +0200, Alex Naidis wrote:
> Yeah, I agree, it is wrong to rely on work_busy() providing correct data.
> However sometimes it is useful to have an indicator like this to at least
> catch some cases where requeuing work would be obsolete.
> This applies for delayed work too.

Can you elaborage on "requeueing work would be obsolate" a bit?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun