Re: MIPS: Alchemy: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in alchemy_pci_probe()
From: Manuel Lauss
Date: Thu May 25 2017 - 05:30:42 EST
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:54 AM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> How do you think about to achieve a small code reduction also for this software module?
>>
>> Generally speaking, sure.
>
> Thanks for your interest in such a direction.
>
>
>> But why remove just this one? Is it because it loosely follows a
>> pattern that was deemed removable in that slidedeck you linked to?
>
> I derived another source code search approach from the implementation
> of the check âOOM_MESSAGEâ in the script âcheckpatch.plâ for
> the semantic patch language (Coccinelle software).
> The involved search patterns are still evolving and the used lists
> (or regular expressions) for function names where it might make sense
> to reconsider the usage of special logging calls is therefore incomplete.
>
>
>> (the "usb_submit_urb()" part)?
>
> Would you like to extend the function selection for further considerations?
>
>
>>> Do you find information from a Linux allocation failure report sufficient
>>> for such a function implementation?
>>
>> Yes, I wrote that code, and in case this driver doesn't load, I'd like
>> to know precisely where initialization failed.
>> I can happily spare a few bytes for that.
>
> Does this kind of answer contain a bit of contradiction?
>
> * Why do you seem to insist on another message if information from a Linux
> allocation failure report would be sufficient already also for this
> software module?
>
> * Do you want that it can become easier to map a position in a backtrace
> to a place in your source code?
Does kmalloc() nowadays print a message which invocation (source line) failed?
If so I won't be standing in your way, but if not, you need to come up with
something for convincing than answering questions with more questions.
Manuel