Re: [RESEND: PATCH v4 2/4] remoteproc: qcom: refactor mss fw image loading sequence
From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Thu May 25 2017 - 15:13:02 EST
On Tue 16 May 11:02 PDT 2017, Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi wrote:
> This patch refactor code to first load all firmware blobs
> and then update modem proc to authenticate and boot fw.
Nice, I like this! Just some style details below.
> Also make a trivial change in a error log.
>
> Signed-off-by: Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi <akdwived@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c
> index 8fd697a..2626954 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c
> @@ -466,9 +466,10 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_init_image(struct q6v5 *qproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>
> ret = q6v5_rmb_mba_wait(qproc, RMB_MBA_META_DATA_AUTH_SUCCESS, 1000);
> if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
> - dev_err(qproc->dev, "MPSS header authentication timed out\n");
> + dev_err(qproc->dev, "metadata authentication timed out\n");
> else if (ret < 0)
> - dev_err(qproc->dev, "MPSS header authentication failed: %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(qproc->dev,
> + "metadata authentication failed: %d\n", ret);
I'm happy to accept these changes if they better describe the errors,
but please send them in a separate patch in that case - and please don't
line break that second print.
>
> dma_free_attrs(qproc->dev, fw->size, ptr, phys, dma_attrs);
>
> @@ -503,7 +504,7 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_load(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> bool relocate = false;
> char seg_name[10];
> ssize_t offset;
> - size_t size;
> + size_t size = 0;
> void *ptr;
> int ret;
> int i;
> @@ -541,7 +542,9 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_load(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> }
>
> mpss_reloc = relocate ? min_addr : qproc->mpss_phys;
> -
> + /* Load firmware completely before letting mss to start
> + * authentication and then boot firmware
> + */
/*
* The first line of a multi-line comment should be empty.
*/
Also your comment tend to tell the story of your change, that's what the
commit message is for, the comment should describe the code regardless
of history;
I think it makes sense to have a comment in the lines of:
/* Load the firmware segments */
> for (i = 0; i < ehdr->e_phnum; i++) {
> phdr = &phdrs[i];
>
> @@ -574,17 +577,13 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_load(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> memset(ptr + phdr->p_filesz, 0,
> phdr->p_memsz - phdr->p_filesz);
> }
> -
> - size = readl(qproc->rmb_base + RMB_PMI_CODE_LENGTH_REG);
> - if (!size) {
> - boot_addr = relocate ? qproc->mpss_phys : min_addr;
> - writel(boot_addr, qproc->rmb_base + RMB_PMI_CODE_START_REG);
> - writel(RMB_CMD_LOAD_READY, qproc->rmb_base + RMB_MBA_COMMAND_REG);
> - }
> -
> size += phdr->p_memsz;
> - writel(size, qproc->rmb_base + RMB_PMI_CODE_LENGTH_REG);
> }
Please put a blank line here, to separate the steps like "paragraphs".
> + /* Transfer ownership of modem region with modem fw */
> + boot_addr = relocate ? qproc->mpss_phys : min_addr;
> + writel(boot_addr, qproc->rmb_base + RMB_PMI_CODE_START_REG);
> + writel(RMB_CMD_LOAD_READY, qproc->rmb_base + RMB_MBA_COMMAND_REG);
> + writel(size, qproc->rmb_base + RMB_PMI_CODE_LENGTH_REG);
I originally did something similar, but ran into some issue - so I will
test this on 8974 and 8916 as soon as my devboards are back online.
Regards,
Bjorn